Athlon 64 X2 5000+ vs Celeron 1000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Core i3-3110M Core i3-3120M Core i3-3217U Core i5-3210M Core i5-3230M Core i5-3320M Core i5-3337U Core i7-3520M Core i7-3610QM Core i7-3630QM Core i7-3632QM Pentium 2020M
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Athlon 64 FX-62 Athlon 64 LE-1620 Athlon 64 X2 4400+ Athlon 64 X2 4600+ Athlon 64 X2 4800+ Athlon 64 X2 4000+ Athlon 64 X2 5000+ Athlon 64 X2 5200+ Athlon 64 X2 5400+ Athlon 64 X2 5600+ Athlon 64 X2 6000+ Athlon 64 X2 6400+ BE

Aggregate performance score

Celeron 1000M
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.67
+34%
Athlon 64 X2 5000+
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 89 Watt
0.50

Celeron 1000M outperforms Athlon 64 X2 5000+ by a substantial 34% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Celeron 1000M Celeron 1000M
Athlon 64 X2 5000+ Athlon 64 X2 5000+

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 1000M and Athlon 64 X2 5000+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27312882
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Power efficiency1.81no data
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Windsor (2006−2007)
Release date20 January 2013 (11 years ago)May 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron 1000M and Athlon 64 X2 5000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)256 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)512 KB
L3 cache2 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm90 nm
Die size118 mm2220 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)105 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million154 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 1000M and Athlon 64 X2 5000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCPGA988AM2
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt89 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 1000M and Athlon 64 X2 5000+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Celeron 1000M and Athlon 64 X2 5000+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 1000M and Athlon 64 X2 5000+ are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 1000M and Athlon 64 X2 5000+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 1000M and Athlon 64 X2 5000+ integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 1000M and Athlon 64 X2 5000+.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 1000M 0.67
+34%
Athlon 64 X2 5000+ 0.50

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron 1000M 1069
+35.8%
Athlon 64 X2 5000+ 787

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Celeron 1000M 296
+51.8%
Athlon 64 X2 5000+ 195

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Celeron 1000M 509
+51.9%
Athlon 64 X2 5000+ 335

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.67 0.50
Chip lithography 22 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 89 Watt

Celeron 1000M has a 34% higher aggregate performance score, a 309.1% more advanced lithography process, and 154.3% lower power consumption.

The Celeron 1000M is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron 1000M is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 X2 5000+ is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 1000M and Athlon 64 X2 5000+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

Intel Celeron 1000M
Celeron 1000M
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+
Athlon 64 X2 5000+
Like
Like

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Celeron 1000M Celeron 1000M
vs
Pentium 3556U Pentium 3556U
Athlon 64 X2 5000+ Athlon 64 X2 5000+
vs
Athlon 1100 Athlon 1100
Celeron 1000M Celeron 1000M
vs
Celeron T1700 Celeron T1700
i7-7820X Core i7 7820X
vs
Ryzen 5 5600H Ryzen 5 5600H
Opteron X2 270 Opteron X2 270
vs
i5-12500H Core i5 12500H
Ryzen 5 1600X Ryzen 5 1600X
vs
i5-8400T Core i5 8400T
Atom 230 Atom 230
vs
Pentium 4 HT 531 Pentium 4 HT 531
Pentium E5200 Pentium E5200
vs
Pentium 4 2.80 Pentium 4 2.80
Pentium E5500 Pentium E5500
vs
Athlon 64 X2 3800+ Athlon 64 X2 3800+
Xeon E5-1620 Xeon E5 1620
vs
Athlon 300U Athlon 300U
Athlon II X4 610e Athlon II X4 610e
vs
i7-10700F Core i7 10700F
Phenom X3 8550 Phenom X3 8550
vs
Ryzen 7 7800X3D Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Athlon 64 X2 4400+ Athlon 64 X2 4400+
vs
Pentium G630 Pentium G630

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.

2.8 166 votes

Rate Celeron 1000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 184 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 1000M or Athlon 64 X2 5000+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.