Core 2 Duo E8400 vs Atom x7-E3950
Aggregated performance score
Atom x7-E3950 outperforms Core 2 Duo E8400 by 61% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Atom x7-E3950 and Core 2 Duo E8400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2222 | 2533 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 1.86 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | 7x Intel Atom | no data |
| Architecture codename | Apollo Lake (2016) | Wolfdale (2008−2010) |
| Release date | 30 August 2014 (9 years ago) | 1 January 2008 (16 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $57 | no data |
| Current price | $377 (6.6x MSRP) | $67 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Atom x7-E3950 and Core 2 Duo E8400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 56K (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | no data | 104 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 110 °C | 72 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 103 °C | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 410 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
| VID voltage range | no data | 0.85V-1.3625V |
Compatibility
Information on Atom x7-E3950 and Core 2 Duo E8400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1296 | LGA775 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Core 2 Duo E8400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | no data | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
| Status | no data | Discontinued |
Security technologies
Atom x7-E3950 and Core 2 Duo E8400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Core 2 Duo E8400 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Core 2 Duo E8400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR4 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 505 | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Core 2 Duo E8400.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 4 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Atom x7-E3950 outperforms Core 2 Duo E8400 by 61% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Atom x7-E3950 outperforms Core 2 Duo E8400 by 60% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core 2 Duo E8400 outperforms Atom x7-E3950 by 58% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Atom x7-E3950 outperforms Core 2 Duo E8400 by 16% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.21 | 0.75 |
| Recency | 30 August 2014 | 1 January 2008 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | 65 Watt |
The Atom x7-E3950 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo E8400 in performance tests.
Be aware that Atom x7-E3950 is a notebook processor while Core 2 Duo E8400 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x7-E3950 and Core 2 Duo E8400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
