Atom x5-E3930 vs x7-E3950

Aggregated performance score

Atom x7-E3950
2014
4 cores / 4 threads
1.21
+102%

x7-E3950 outperforms x5-E3930 by a whopping 102% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom x7-E3950 and Atom x5-E3930 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking22282669
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series7x Intel Atom5x Intel Atom
Architecture codenameApollo Lake (2016)Apollo Lake (2016)
Release date30 August 2014 (9 years ago)30 August 2014 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$57no data
Current price$377 (6.6x MSRP)$965

Detailed specifications

Atom x7-E3950 and Atom x5-E3930 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.6 GHz1.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz1.8 GHz
L1 cache56K (per core)56K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature110 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)103 °C103 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Atom x7-E3950 and Atom x5-E3930 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketIntel BGA 1296Intel BGA 1296
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt7 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Atom x5-E3930. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++

Security technologies

Atom x7-E3950 and Atom x5-E3930 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Atom x5-E3930 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Atom x5-E3930. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR3-1866
Maximum memory size8 GB8 GB

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 505Intel HD Graphics 500

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom x7-E3950 and Atom x5-E3930.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes44

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom x7-E3950 1.21
+102%
Atom x5-E3930 0.60

x7-E3950 outperforms x5-E3930 by 102% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Atom x7-E3950 1864
+101%
Atom x5-E3930 928

x7-E3950 outperforms x5-E3930 by 101% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.21 0.60
Integrated graphics card 0.86 0.75
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 7 Watt

The Atom x7-E3950 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom x5-E3930 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom x7-E3950 and Atom x5-E3930, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom x7-E3950
Atom x7-E3950
Intel Atom x5-E3930
Atom x5-E3930

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 44 votes

Rate Atom x7-E3950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom x5-E3930 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom x7-E3950 or Atom x5-E3930, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.