Celeron 2.40 vs Atom Z520

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom Z520
2008
1 core / 2 threads, 2 Watt
0.08
Celeron 2.40
2003
1 core / 1 thread, 73 Watt
0.09
+12.5%

Celeron 2.40 outperforms Atom Z520 by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom Z520 and Celeron 2.40 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking33883377
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiency3.790.12
Architecture codenameSilverthorne (2008−2010)Northwood (2002−2004)
Release date2 April 2008 (16 years ago)March 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$65no data

Detailed specifications

Atom Z520 and Celeron 2.40 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed1.33 GHzno data
Boost clock speed0.03 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate533.33 MT/sno data
Multiplier10no data
L1 cache56 KB8 KB
L2 cache512 KB128 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm130 nm
Die size24.18 mm2146 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors47 Million55 million
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.75-1.1Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom Z520 and Celeron 2.40 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketPBGA441478
Power consumption (TDP)2 Watt73 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z520 and Celeron 2.40. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching+no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Atom Z520 and Celeron 2.40 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z520 and Celeron 2.40 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z520 and Celeron 2.40. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1, DDR2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom Z520 0.08
Celeron 2.40 0.09
+12.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom Z520 122
Celeron 2.40 143
+17.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.08 0.09
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 73 Watt

Atom Z520 has 100% more threads, a 188.9% more advanced lithography process, and 3550% lower power consumption.

Celeron 2.40, on the other hand, has a 12.5% higher aggregate performance score.

The Celeron 2.40 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom Z520 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom Z520 is a notebook processor while Celeron 2.40 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z520 and Celeron 2.40, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom Z520
Atom Z520
Intel Celeron 2.40
Celeron 2.40

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 27 votes

Rate Atom Z520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 38 votes

Rate Celeron 2.40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom Z520 or Celeron 2.40, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.