Atom Z520 vs N280

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom N280
2009
1 core / 2 threads, 2 Watt
0.10
+25%
Atom Z520
2008
1 core / 2 threads, 2 Watt
0.08

Atom N280 outperforms Atom Z520 by a significant 25% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom N280 and Atom Z520 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking33693388
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Atom
Power efficiency3.793.79
Architecture codenameDiamondVille (2008−2009)Silverthorne (2008−2010)
Release date1 February 2009 (15 years ago)2 April 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$65

Detailed specifications

Atom N280 and Atom Z520 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.66 GHz1.33 GHz
Boost clock speed0.07 GHz0.03 GHz
Bus typeFSBFSB
Bus rate666.66 MT/s533.33 MT/s
Multiplier1010
L1 cache56 KB56 KB
L2 cache512 KB512 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size25.9638 mm224.18 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C90 °C
Number of transistors47 Million47 Million
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.9V-1.1625V0.75-1.1V

Compatibility

Information on Atom N280 and Atom Z520 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPBGA437PBGA441
Power consumption (TDP)2.5 Watt2 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N280 and Atom Z520. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switching-+
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Atom N280 and Atom Z520 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N280 and Atom Z520 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N280 and Atom Z520. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Maximum memory size8 GBno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card--

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom N280 0.10
+25%
Atom Z520 0.08

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom N280 157
+28.7%
Atom Z520 122

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Atom N280 567
+26.3%
Atom Z520 449

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Atom N280 877
+27.2%
Atom Z520 690

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Atom N280 507
+29.7%
Atom Z520 391

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Atom N280 115
+27.2%
Atom Z520 146.28

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.10 0.08
Recency 1 February 2009 2 April 2008

Atom N280 has a 25% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 9 months.

The Atom N280 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom Z520 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N280 and Atom Z520, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N280
Atom N280
Intel Atom Z520
Atom Z520

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 30 votes

Rate Atom N280 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 27 votes

Rate Atom Z520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom N280 or Atom Z520, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.