Celeron M 530 vs Atom Z2760

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom Z2760
2012
2 cores / 4 threads, 3 Watt
0.19
Celeron M 530
1 core / 1 thread, 30 Watt
0.19

Primary details

Comparing Atom Z2760 and Celeron M 530 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32543250
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataCeleron M
Power efficiency5.990.60
Architecture codenameCloverview (2012)Merom (2006−2008)
Release date27 September 2012 (12 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

Atom Z2760 and Celeron M 530 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed1.8 GHz1.73 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz1.73 GHz
Bus rateno data533 MHz
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)no data
L3 cache0 KB1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size65 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors140 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.95V-1.3V

Compatibility

Information on Atom Z2760 and Celeron M 530 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFC-MB4760PBGA479,PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)3 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z2760 and Celeron M 530. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Atom Z2760 and Celeron M 530 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z2760 and Celeron M 530 are enumerated here.

VT-x--

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z2760 and Celeron M 530. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2no data
Maximum memory size2.4 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth6.4 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardPowerVR SGX545 (533 MHz)no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom Z2760 0.19
Celeron M 530 0.19

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom Z2760 298
Celeron M 530 302
+1.3%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Atom Z2760 602
Celeron M 530 1615
+168%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Atom Z2760 945
+27.9%
Celeron M 530 739

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 3 Watt 30 Watt

Atom Z2760 has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 103.1% more advanced lithography process, and 900% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Atom Z2760 and Celeron M 530.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z2760 and Celeron M 530, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom Z2760
Atom Z2760
Intel Celeron M 530
Celeron M 530

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 15 votes

Rate Atom Z2760 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 40 votes

Rate Celeron M 530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom Z2760 or Celeron M 530, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.