Celeron M 530 vs Atom Z2580

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom Z2580
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 3 Watt
0.25
+31.6%
Celeron M 530
1 core / 1 thread, 30 Watt
0.19

Atom Z2580 outperforms Celeron M 530 by a substantial 32% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom Z2580 and Celeron M 530 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31653250
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataCeleron M
Power efficiency7.890.60
Architecture codenameClovertrail (2013)Merom (2006−2008)
Release date27 February 2013 (11 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

Atom Z2580 and Celeron M 530 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speedno data1.73 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz1.73 GHz
Bus rateno data533 MHz
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache512K (per core)no data
L3 cache0 KB1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size65 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Number of transistors140 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.95V-1.3V

Compatibility

Information on Atom Z2580 and Celeron M 530 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFC-MB4760PBGA479,PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)3 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z2580 and Celeron M 530. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAE32 Bitno data
Smart Idle+no data
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Atom Z2580 and Celeron M 530 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z2580 and Celeron M 530 are enumerated here.

VT-x+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z2580 and Celeron M 530. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2no data
Maximum memory size2 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth8.5 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardPowerVR SGX544MP2 (400 MHz)no data
Graphics max frequency533 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom Z2580 and Celeron M 530 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom Z2580 and Celeron M 530.

USB revision2.0 OTG, USB-SPH 2.0no data
Number of USB ports2no data
UART3no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.25 0.19
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 3 Watt 30 Watt

Atom Z2580 has a 31.6% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 103.1% more advanced lithography process, and 900% lower power consumption.

The Atom Z2580 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 530 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom Z2580 and Celeron M 530, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom Z2580
Atom Z2580
Intel Celeron M 530
Celeron M 530

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 5 votes

Rate Atom Z2580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 40 votes

Rate Celeron M 530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom Z2580 or Celeron M 530, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.