Celeron N3350 vs Atom Z2580
Aggregate performance score
Celeron N3350 outperforms Atom Z2580 by a whopping 174% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3404 | 2970 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Celeron |
| Power efficiency | 3.24 | 4.44 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | no data |
| Architecture codename | Clovertrail (2013) | Apollo Lake (2014−2016) |
| Release date | 27 February 2013 (12 years ago) | 30 August 2016 (9 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $24 |
Detailed specifications
Atom Z2580 and Celeron N3350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 11 |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 65 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | 140 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Atom Z2580 and Celeron N3350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | FC-MB4760 | FCBGA1296 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom Z2580 and Celeron N3350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 | no data |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | - |
| Idle States | + | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
| Smart Response | no data | - |
| PAE | 32 Bit | no data |
| GPIO | no data | + |
| Smart Connect | no data | - |
| Smart Idle | + | no data |
| HD Audio | no data | + |
| RST | no data | - |
Security technologies
Atom Z2580 and Celeron N3350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Boot | no data | + |
| MPX | - | + |
| Identity Protection | - | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
| Anti-Theft | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom Z2580 and Celeron N3350 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| VT-i | no data | - |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom Z2580 and Celeron N3350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR2 | DDR3, DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 8.5 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | PowerVR SGX544MP2 (400 MHz) | Intel HD Graphics 500 |
| Max video memory | no data | 8 GB |
| Quick Sync Video | - | + |
| Clear Video | no data | + |
| Clear Video HD | no data | + |
| Graphics max frequency | 533 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Execution Units | no data | 12 |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Atom Z2580 and Celeron N3350 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 2 | 3 |
| eDP | no data | + |
| DisplayPort | - | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
| MIPI-DSI | no data | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Atom Z2580 and Celeron N3350 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | + |
| OpenGL | no data | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom Z2580 and Celeron N3350.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 6 |
| USB revision | 2.0 OTG, USB-SPH 2.0 | 2.0/3.0 |
| Total number of SATA ports | no data | 2 |
| Number of USB ports | 2 | 8 |
| Integrated LAN | no data | - |
| UART | 3 | + |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core
Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.23 | 0.63 |
| Recency | 27 February 2013 | 30 August 2016 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 6 Watt |
Atom Z2580 has 100% more threads, and 100% lower power consumption.
Celeron N3350, on the other hand, has a 173.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.
The Intel Celeron N3350 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom Z2580 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
