Atom Z2420 vs Celeron N3350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron N3350 and Atom Z2420 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2673not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeronno data
Architecture codenameApollo Lake (2016)Saltwell (2013)
Release date30 August 2016 (8 years ago)1 January 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$24no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron N3350 and Atom Z2420 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz1.2 GHz
Multiplier11no data
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data65 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C90 °C
Number of transistorsno data140 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Celeron N3350 and Atom Z2420 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1296FC-MB4617
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt3 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron N3350 and Atom Z2420. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE, Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Response-no data
PAEno data32 Bit
GPIO+152
Smart Connect-no data
StatusLaunchedDiscontinued
HD Audio+no data
RST-no data

Security technologies

Celeron N3350 and Atom Z2420 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron N3350 and Atom Z2420 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
VT-i-no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron N3350 and Atom Z2420. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR2
Maximum memory size8 GB1 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 500PowerVR SGX540 (400 MHz)
Max video memory8 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency650 MHzno data
Execution Units12no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron N3350 and Atom Z2420 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
MIPI-DSI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron N3350 and Atom Z2420 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX+no data
OpenGL+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron N3350 and Atom Z2420.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes6no data
USB revision2.0/3.02.0 OTG
Total number of SATA ports2no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports2no data
Number of USB ports81
Integrated LAN-no data
UART+3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 August 2016 1 January 2013
Physical cores 2 1
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 3 Watt

Celeron N3350 has an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

Atom Z2420, on the other hand, has 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Celeron N3350 and Atom Z2420. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron N3350 and Atom Z2420, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron N3350
Celeron N3350
Intel Atom Z2420
Atom Z2420

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 939 votes

Rate Celeron N3350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Atom Z2420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron N3350 or Atom Z2420, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.