Athlon 300U vs Atom N455

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom N455 and Athlon 300U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated1659
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomAMD Athlon
Architecture codenamePinetrail (2009−2010)Raven Ridge 2 (2019)
Release date1 June 2010 (14 years ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$64no data
Current price$163 (2.5x MSRP)$486

Detailed specifications

Atom N455 and Athlon 300U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed1.66 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed1.67 GHz3.3 GHz
Bus support533 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size66 mm2209.78 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors123 million4500 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Atom N455 and Athlon 300U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA559FP5
Power consumption (TDP)6.5 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N455 and Athlon 300U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Atom N455 and Athlon 300U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N455 and Athlon 300U are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N455 and Athlon 300U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size2 GB64 GB
Max memory channels12
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel GMA 3150AMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom N455 and Athlon 300U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Atom N455 193
Athlon 300U 3923
+1933%

Athlon 300U outperforms Atom N455 by 1933% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Atom N455 564
Athlon 300U 3968
+604%

Athlon 300U outperforms Atom N455 by 604% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Atom N455 863
Athlon 300U 8724
+911%

Athlon 300U outperforms Atom N455 by 911% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Atom N455 119.5
Athlon 300U 15.44
+674%

Atom N455 outperforms Athlon 300U by 674% in wPrime 32.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2010 6 January 2019
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 15 Watt

We couldn't decide between Atom N455 and Athlon 300U. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N455 and Athlon 300U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N455
Atom N455
AMD Athlon 300U
Athlon 300U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 216 votes

Rate Atom N455 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 452 votes

Rate Athlon 300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom N455 or Athlon 300U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.