EPYC 7313 vs Atom N450

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom N450 and EPYC 7313 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated202
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data16.11
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel AtomAMD EPYC
Power efficiencyno data15.02
Architecture codenamePinetrail (2009−2011)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date21 December 2009 (14 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$64$1,083

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom N450 and EPYC 7313 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads232
Base clock speed1.66 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.67 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rate533 MHzno data
Multiplierno data30
L1 cache56 KB (per core)1 MB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)8 MB
L3 cache0 KB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm+
Die size66 mm24x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors123 million16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom N450 and EPYC 7313 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA559SP3
Power consumption (TDP)5.5 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom N450 and EPYC 7313. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data

Security technologies

Atom N450 and EPYC 7313 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom N450 and EPYC 7313 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom N450 and EPYC 7313. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size2 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom N450 and EPYC 7313.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom N450 203
EPYC 7313 39091
+19157%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Atom N450 72
EPYC 7313 1487
+1965%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Atom N450 114
EPYC 7313 11432
+9928%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 December 2009 12 January 2021
Physical cores 1 16
Threads 2 32
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 5 Watt 155 Watt

Atom N450 has 3000% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7313, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom N450 and EPYC 7313. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom N450 is a notebook processor while EPYC 7313 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom N450 and EPYC 7313, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom N450
Atom N450
AMD EPYC 7313
EPYC 7313

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 174 votes

Rate Atom N450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 31 vote

Rate EPYC 7313 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom N450 or EPYC 7313, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.