Ryzen 5 3400G vs Athlon II X2 255

Aggregate performance score

Athlon II X2 255
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.74
Ryzen 5 3400G
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.84
+689%

Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms Athlon II X2 255 by a whopping 689% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II X2 255 and Ryzen 5 3400G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26621112
Place by popularitynot in top-10092
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency1.078.47
Architecture codenameRegor (2009−2013)Picasso (2019−2022)
Release date25 January 2010 (14 years ago)12 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$60no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon II X2 255 and Ryzen 5 3400G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed3.1 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Multiplierno data37
L1 cache128 KB384 KB
L2 cache1 MB2 MB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm12 nm
Die size117 mm2210 mm2
Number of transistors410 million4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II X2 255 and Ryzen 5 3400G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM3AM4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II X2 255 and Ryzen 5 3400G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II X2 255 and Ryzen 5 3400G are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X2 255 and Ryzen 5 3400G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2933
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 11

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X2 255 and Ryzen 5 3400G.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon II X2 255 0.74
Ryzen 5 3400G 5.84
+689%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon II X2 255 1175
Ryzen 5 3400G 9250
+687%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon II X2 255 293
Ryzen 5 3400G 1133
+287%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon II X2 255 403
Ryzen 5 3400G 3630
+801%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.74 5.84
Recency 25 January 2010 12 June 2019
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 45 nm 12 nm

Ryzen 5 3400G has a 689.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 3400G is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II X2 255 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X2 255 and Ryzen 5 3400G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II X2 255
Athlon II X2 255
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
Ryzen 5 3400G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 175 votes

Rate Athlon II X2 255 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 2119 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3400G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II X2 255 or Ryzen 5 3400G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.