Celeron 430 vs Atom D525

VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom D525
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 13 Watt
0.25
+38.9%
Celeron 430
2007
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.18

Atom D525 outperforms Celeron 430 by a substantial 39% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom D525 and Celeron 430 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31613260
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiency1.820.49
Architecture codenamePinetrail (2009−2011)Conroe-L (2007−2008)
Release date21 June 2010 (14 years ago)June 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$63$50

Detailed specifications

Atom D525 and Celeron 430 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed1.8 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed1.83 GHz1.8 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size66 mm277 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C60 °C
Number of transistors176 million105 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1V-1.3375V

Compatibility

Information on Atom D525 and Celeron 430 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA559LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom D525 and Celeron 430. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)--
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States--
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching--
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Atom D525 and Celeron 430 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom D525 and Celeron 430 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x--

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom D525 and Celeron 430. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2, DDR3DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size4 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidth6.4 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel GMA 3150no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom D525 0.25
+38.9%
Celeron 430 0.18

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom D525 404
+39.8%
Celeron 430 289

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Atom D525 77
Celeron 430 155
+101%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Atom D525 187
+16.9%
Celeron 430 160

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.25 0.18
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 35 Watt

Atom D525 has a 38.9% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 169.2% lower power consumption.

The Atom D525 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 430 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom D525 is a notebook processor while Celeron 430 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom D525 and Celeron 430, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom D525
Atom D525
Intel Celeron 430
Celeron 430

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 218 votes

Rate Atom D525 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 160 votes

Rate Celeron 430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom D525 or Celeron 430, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.