Celeron J4115 vs Atom C3758
Aggregate performance score
Atom C3758 outperforms Celeron J4115 by an impressive 71% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Atom C3758 and Celeron J4115 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1566 | 1943 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.38 | 0.80 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Atom | Intel Gemini Lake |
| Architecture codename | Goldmont (2016−2017) | Gemini Lake (2019) |
| Release date | 15 August 2017 (6 years ago) | 4 November 2019 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $193 | no data |
| Current price | $1359 (7x MSRP) | $898 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Celeron J4115 has 111% better value for money than Atom C3758.
Detailed specifications
Atom C3758 and Celeron J4115 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 448 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 16 MB | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 82 °C | 105 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Atom C3758 and Celeron J4115 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA1310 | FCBGA1090 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3758 and Celeron J4115. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| vPro | no data | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| QuickAssist | + | no data |
| Speed Shift | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | no data | + |
| Smart Response | no data | - |
| GPIO | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
Security technologies
Atom C3758 and Celeron J4115 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | + | + |
| Secure Boot | + | no data |
| Secure Key | + | + |
| MPX | no data | + |
| Identity Protection | no data | + |
| SGX | - | Yes with Intel® ME |
| OS Guard | + | + |
| Anti-Theft | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3758 and Celeron J4115 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3758 and Celeron J4115. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4: 2400 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 256 GB | 8 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.134 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
| Max video memory | no data | 8 GB |
| Quick Sync Video | no data | + |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 750 MHz |
| Execution Units | no data | 12 |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Atom C3758 and Celeron J4115 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
| eDP | no data | + |
| DisplayPort | no data | + |
| HDMI | no data | + |
| MIPI-DSI | no data | + |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Atom C3758 and Celeron J4115 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| 4K resolution support | no data | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Atom C3758 and Celeron J4115 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | 12 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.4 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3758 and Celeron J4115.
| PCIe version | 3 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 6 |
| USB revision | 3 | 2.0/3.0 |
| Total number of SATA ports | 16 | 2 |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 16 | 2 |
| Number of USB ports | 8 | 8 |
| Integrated LAN | 4x10/2.5/1 GBE | - |
| UART | no data | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Atom C3758 outperforms Celeron J4115 by 71% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Atom C3758 outperforms Celeron J4115 by 72% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.98 | 1.74 |
| Recency | 15 August 2017 | 4 November 2019 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 4 |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 10 Watt |
The Atom C3758 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J4115 in performance tests.
Be aware that Atom C3758 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron J4115 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Atom C3758 and Celeron J4115, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
