GX-210JA vs Atom 330

VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom 330
2008
2 cores / 4 threads, 8 Watt
0.23
+43.8%
GX-210JA
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.16

Atom 330 outperforms GX-210JA by a considerable 44% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom 330 and GX-210JA processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking31893305
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomAMD
Power efficiency2.722.52
Architecture codenameDiamondville (2008−2009)Temash (2013)
Release date2 April 2008 (16 years ago)23 May 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$43no data

Detailed specifications

Atom 330 and GX-210JA basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz1 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate533.33 MT/sno data
Multiplier12no data
L1 cache112 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Die size51.9276 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature85 °Cno data
Number of transistors94 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.9V-1.1625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom 330 and GX-210JA compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketPBGA437FT3 BGA
Power consumption (TDP)8 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom 330 and GX-210JA. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE386x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Atom 330 and GX-210JA technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom 330 and GX-210JA are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom 330 and GX-210JA. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory size8 GBno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom 330 0.23
+43.8%
GX-210JA 0.16

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom 330 363
+46.4%
GX-210JA 248

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.23 0.16
Recency 2 April 2008 23 May 2013
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 6 Watt

Atom 330 has a 43.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

GX-210JA, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

The Atom 330 is our recommended choice as it beats the GX-210JA in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom 330 and GX-210JA, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom 330
Atom 330
AMD GX-210JA
GX-210JA

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 65 votes

Rate Atom 330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 4 votes

Rate GX-210JA on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom 330 or GX-210JA, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.