Ryzen 9 7840HX vs Athlon XP-M 1700+
Primary details
Comparing Athlon XP-M 1700+ and Ryzen 9 7840HX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Athlon XP-M | AMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7045) |
| Architecture codename | K7 (2000−2004) | Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 12 March 2003 (21 year ago) | 17 January 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $123 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Athlon XP-M 1700+ and Ryzen 9 7840HX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.47 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Bus type | FSB | no data |
| Bus rate | 266 MT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 11 | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 768 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB | 12 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 64 MB |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 85 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 37 Million | 9900 Million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon XP-M 1700+ and Ryzen 9 7840HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | Socket 563 | FL1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon XP-M 1700+ and Ryzen 9 7840HX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| PowerNow | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon XP-M 1700+ and Ryzen 9 7840HX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 610M |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 12 March 2003 | 17 January 2024 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 12 |
| Threads | 1 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 55 Watt |
Athlon XP-M 1700+ has 120% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 9 7840HX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 20 years, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 2500% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Athlon XP-M 1700+ and Ryzen 9 7840HX. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon XP-M 1700+ and Ryzen 9 7840HX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
