To get the index we compare the characteristics of the processors and their cost, taking into account the cost of other processors.
AMD A10-5700 vs Athlon X4 750K
Price now
15.76$
Games supported
71%
- Interface
- Core clock speed
- Max video memory
- Memory type
- Memory clock speed
- Maximum resolution
- Interface
- Core clock speed
- Max video memory
- Memory type
- Memory clock speed
- Maximum resolution
Price now
86$
Games supported
71%
General info
Comparing Athlon X4 750K and A10-5700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance rating | 1737 | 1745 |
| Value for money | no data | 3.34 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | Trinity (2012−2013) | Trinity (2012−2013) |
| Release date | 2 October 2012 (10 years old) | 2 October 2012 (10 years old) |
| Current price | $15.76 | $86 |
Value for money
no data
Technical specs
Athlon X4 750K and A10-5700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 4 GHz |
| L1 cache | 192K | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 246 mm2 | 246 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | 71 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1,303 million | 1,178 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon X4 750K and A10-5700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FM2 | FM2 |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X4 750K and A10-5700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | no data |
| FMA | + | no data |
| AVX | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X4 750K and A10-5700 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X4 750K and A10-5700. Depending on the motherboards, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1866 | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon HD 7660D |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon X4 750K and A10-5700.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
- Passmark
- GeekBench 5 Single-Core
- GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 67%
Athlon X4 750K outperforms A10-5700 by 1% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 37%
Athlon X4 750K outperforms A10-5700 by 6% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 37%
Athlon X4 750K outperforms A10-5700 by 4% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance rating | 2.24 | 2.21 |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technical City couldn't decide between
and
The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X4 750K and A10-5700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Competitors of Athlon X4 750K by Intel
We believe that the nearest equivalent to Athlon X4 750K by Intel is Core i7-870S, which is nearly equal in speed and higher by 1 position in our rating.
Here are some closest Intel rivals to Athlon X4 750K:
Competitors of A10-5700 by Intel
We believe that the nearest equivalent to A10-5700 from Intel is Pentium G4500, which is nearly equal in speed and lower by 1 position in our rating.
Here are some closest Intel rivals to A10-5700:
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
