i9-13900F vs Athlon X4 750

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon X4 750
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.65
Core i9-13900F
2023
24 cores / 32 threads, 65 Watt
32.27
+1856%

Core i9-13900F outperforms Athlon X4 750 by a whopping 1856% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon X4 750 and Core i9-13900F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2069125
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data54.71
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.4046.94
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release dateOctober 2013 (11 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$524

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon X4 750 and Core i9-13900F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads432
Base clock speed3.4 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz5.5 GHz
L1 cache192K80K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size246 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °C72 °C
Number of transistors1,303 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X4 750 and Core i9-13900F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X4 750 and Core i9-13900F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Athlon X4 750 and Core i9-13900F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X4 750 and Core i9-13900F are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X4 750 and Core i9-13900F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data192 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data89.6 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon X4 750 and Core i9-13900F.

PCIe version2.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon X4 750 1.65
i9-13900F 32.27
+1856%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon X4 750 2625
i9-13900F 51259
+1853%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.65 32.27
Physical cores 4 24
Threads 4 32

i9-13900F has a 1855.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 500% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

The Core i9-13900F is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon X4 750 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X4 750 and Core i9-13900F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X4 750
Athlon X4 750
Intel Core i9-13900F
Core i9-13900F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 40 votes

Rate Athlon X4 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 156 votes

Rate Core i9-13900F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon X4 750 or Core i9-13900F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.