E1-1500 vs Athlon X2 QL-64

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon X2 QL-64
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.39
+56%
E1-1500
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.25

Athlon X2 QL-64 outperforms E1-1500 by an impressive 56% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon X2 QL-64 and E1-1500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30203173
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Series2x AMD AthlonAMD E-Series
Power efficiency1.051.31
Architecture codenameLion (2008−2009)Zacate (2011−2013)
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years ago)6 January 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon X2 QL-64 and E1-1500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz1.48 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHzno data
L1 cache256 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm40 nm
Die sizeno data75 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X2 QL-64 and E1-1500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketS1FT1 BGA 413-Ball
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X2 QL-64 and E1-1500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD VirtualizationMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V
PowerNow++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X2 QL-64 and E1-1500 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X2 QL-64 and E1-1500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 7310

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon X2 QL-64 0.39
+56%
E1-1500 0.25

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon X2 QL-64 622
+59.1%
E1-1500 391

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon X2 QL-64 201
+86.1%
E1-1500 108

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon X2 QL-64 384
+101%
E1-1500 191

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.39 0.25
Recency 1 January 2009 6 January 2013
Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 18 Watt

Athlon X2 QL-64 has a 56% higher aggregate performance score.

E1-1500, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 62.5% more advanced lithography process, and 94.4% lower power consumption.

The Athlon X2 QL-64 is our recommended choice as it beats the E1-1500 in performance tests.

Be aware that Athlon X2 QL-64 is a notebook processor while E1-1500 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X2 QL-64 and E1-1500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X2 QL-64
Athlon X2 QL-64
AMD E1-1500
E1-1500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 37 votes

Rate Athlon X2 QL-64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 162 votes

Rate E1-1500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon X2 QL-64 or E1-1500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.