Phenom X4 9500 vs Athlon X2 QL-60
Aggregate performance score
Phenom X4 9500 outperforms Athlon X2 QL-60 by a whopping 188% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Athlon X2 QL-60 and Phenom X4 9500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3070 | 2482 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | 2x AMD Athlon | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.92 | 0.98 |
| Architecture codename | Lion (2008−2009) | Agena (2007−2008) |
| Release date | 3 June 2008 (16 years ago) | November 2007 (17 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Athlon X2 QL-60 and Phenom X4 9500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.9 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 3600 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 2 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | no data | 285 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 450 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon X2 QL-60 and Phenom X4 9500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | S1 | AM2+ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X2 QL-60 and Phenom X4 9500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization | no data |
| PowerNow | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X2 QL-60 and Phenom X4 9500 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.34 | 0.98 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 95 Watt |
Athlon X2 QL-60 has 171.4% lower power consumption.
Phenom X4 9500, on the other hand, has a 188.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
The Phenom X4 9500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon X2 QL-60 in performance tests.
Be aware that Athlon X2 QL-60 is a notebook processor while Phenom X4 9500 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X2 QL-60 and Phenom X4 9500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
