Athlon 64 X2 6000+ vs Athlon Neo MV-40

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon Neo MV-40
2009
1 core / 1 thread, 15 Watt
0.17
Athlon 64 X2 6000+
2007
2 cores / 2 threads, 125 Watt
0.58
+241%

Athlon 64 X2 6000+ outperforms Athlon Neo MV-40 by a whopping 241% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon Neo MV-40 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32792822
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Athlon Neono data
Power efficiency1.080.44
Architecture codenameHuron (2009)Windsor (2006−2007)
Release date6 January 2009 (16 years ago)August 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon Neo MV-40 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz3.1 GHz
Bus rate1600 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB256 KB
L2 cache512 KB512K
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm90 nm
Die sizeno data220 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data227 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon Neo MV-40 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketASB1AM2
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualizationno data
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon Neo MV-40 0.17
Athlon 64 X2 6000+ 0.58
+241%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon Neo MV-40 275
Athlon 64 X2 6000+ 930
+238%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.17 0.58
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 65 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 125 Watt

Athlon Neo MV-40 has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 733.3% lower power consumption.

Athlon 64 X2 6000+, on the other hand, has a 241.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon Neo MV-40 in performance tests.

Be aware that Athlon Neo MV-40 is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon Neo MV-40 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon Neo MV-40
Athlon Neo MV-40
AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+
Athlon 64 X2 6000+

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 11 votes

Rate Athlon Neo MV-40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 317 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon Neo MV-40 or Athlon 64 X2 6000+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.