Itanium 9330 vs Athlon 64 X2 TK-55

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 and Itanium 9330 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
Series2x Athlon 64no data
Architecture codenameTaylor / Hawk-256no data
Release dateno data1 January 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 and Itanium 9330 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speedno data1.46 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate667 MHzno data
L3 cacheno data20 MB L3 Cache
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 and Itanium 9330 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socketno dataFCLGA1248
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 and Itanium 9330. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Turbo Boost Technologyno data1.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data50 Bit
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 and Itanium 9330 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 and Itanium 9330 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 155 Watt

Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 has 400% lower power consumption.

Itanium 9330, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 and Itanium 9330. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 is a notebook processor while Itanium 9330 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 and Itanium 9330, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-55
Athlon 64 X2 TK-55
Intel Itanium 9330
Itanium 9330

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 27 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 6 votes

Rate Itanium 9330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 X2 TK-55 or Itanium 9330, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.