Silverthorne vs Athlon 64 X2 FX-60

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 and Silverthorne processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	2698	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Desktop processor	Laptop
Series	2x Athlon 64 (Desktop)	no data
Architecture codename	Toledo (2006)	Bonnell (2007−2010)
Release date	no data	18 April 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 and Silverthorne basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	no data
Threads	2	no data
Boost clock speed	2.6 GHz	no data
Bus support	1000 MHz	no data
Chip lithography	90 nm	45 nm0.045 μm 4.5e-5 mm
64 bit support	+	-
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	No	No

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 and Silverthorne compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Power consumption (TDP)

110 Watt

no data

Pros & cons summary

---

Chip lithography

90 nm

45 nm

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 and Silverthorne, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---