Core 2 Duo E6600 vs Athlon 64 X2 FX-60
Aggregated performance score
General info
Comparing Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 and Core 2 Duo E6600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2666 | 2665 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Value for money | no data | 3.46 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | 2x Athlon 64 (Desktop) | Core 2 Duo (Desktop) |
| Architecture codename | Toledo (2006) | Conroe (2006−2007) |
| Release date | no data | no data |
| Current price | no data | $30 |
Value for money
Performance per price, higher is better.
Technical specs
Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 and Core 2 Duo E6600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Bus support | 1000 MHz | 1066 MHz |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 65 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 and Core 2 Duo E6600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Power consumption (TDP) | 110 Watt | 65 Watt |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
Core 2 Duo E6600 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 by 5% in 3DMark06 CPU.
Advantages and disadvantages
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 110 Watt | 65 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 and Core 2 Duo E6600. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 and Core 2 Duo E6600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
