Mobile Pentium III 500 MMC vs Athlon 64 X2 4400+
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4400+ and Mobile Pentium III 500 MMC processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | 2x Athlon 64 (Desktop) | no data |
| Architecture codename | Windsor (2006−2007) | Coppermine (1999−2001) |
| Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | 25 October 1999 (25 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4400+ and Mobile Pentium III 500 MMC basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 0.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1000 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 32 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 256 KB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 180 nm |
| Die size | no data | 106 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 28 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) 4400+ and Mobile Pentium III 500 MMC compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | Intel MMC-2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
Athlon 64 X2 4400+ has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
Mobile Pentium III 500 MMC, on the other hand, has 333.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 X2 4400+ and Mobile Pentium III 500 MMC. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon 64 X2 4400+ is a desktop processor while Mobile Pentium III 500 MMC is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 4400+ and Mobile Pentium III 500 MMC, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
