E1-1200 vs Turion 64 X2 TL-64

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Turion 64 X2 TL-64
2007
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.44
+83.3%
E1-1200
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.24

Turion 64 X2 TL-64 outperforms E1-1200 by an impressive 83% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Turion 64 X2 TL-64 and E1-1200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29613178
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD Turion 64AMD E-Series
Power efficiency1.191.26
Architecture codenameTrinidad (2006−2007)Zacate (2011−2013)
Release date13 April 2007 (17 years ago)6 June 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Turion 64 X2 TL-64 and E1-1200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz1.4 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache256 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm40 nm
Die size147 mm275 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data100 °C
Number of transistors154 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Turion 64 X2 TL-64 and E1-1200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketS1FT1
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-64 and E1-1200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions65 nm, 1.075MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A
PowerNow-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-64 and E1-1200 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Turion 64 X2 TL-64 and E1-1200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 7310

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Turion 64 X2 TL-64 0.44
+83.3%
E1-1200 0.24

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Turion 64 X2 TL-64 692
+82.1%
E1-1200 380

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Turion 64 X2 TL-64 1726
+89.3%
E1-1200 912

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Turion 64 X2 TL-64 3201
+90.3%
E1-1200 1682

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Turion 64 X2 TL-64 1518
+73.8%
E1-1200 874

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.44 0.24
Recency 13 April 2007 6 June 2012
Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 18 Watt

Turion 64 X2 TL-64 has a 83.3% higher aggregate performance score.

E1-1200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 62.5% more advanced lithography process, and 94.4% lower power consumption.

The Turion 64 X2 TL-64 is our recommended choice as it beats the E1-1200 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Turion 64 X2 TL-64 and E1-1200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-64
Turion 64 X2 TL-64
AMD E1-1200
E1-1200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 21 vote

Rate Turion 64 X2 TL-64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 293 votes

Rate E1-1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Turion 64 X2 TL-64 or E1-1200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.