Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G vs Athlon X2 QL-67
Primary details
Comparing Athlon X2 QL-67 and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 587 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | 2x AMD Athlon | AMD Ryzen 7 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 18.74 |
| Architecture codename | Lion (2008−2009) | Renoir (2020−2023) |
| Release date | 1 September 2009 (15 years ago) | 21 July 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Athlon X2 QL-67 and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| Bus rate | 4000 MHz | no data |
| Multiplier | no data | 36 |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 8 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | no data | 156 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 9800 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon X2 QL-67 and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | S1g2 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X2 QL-67 and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization | no data |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| PowerNow | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X2 QL-67 and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X2 QL-67 and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 51.196 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon Vega 8 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon X2 QL-67 and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 September 2009 | 21 July 2020 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
Athlon X2 QL-67 has 85.7% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Athlon X2 QL-67 and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Athlon X2 QL-67 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X2 QL-67 and Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
