Apple M1 Max vs Athlon 64 FX-55

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 FX-55 and Apple M1 Max processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated515
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataApple M-Series
Architecture codenameClawhammer (2001−2005)no data
Release date10 October 2004 (19 years ago)18 October 2021 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$180no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 FX-55 and Apple M1 Max basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads110
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.06 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz3.22 GHz
L1 cache128 KB2.9 MB
L2 cache1 MB28 MB
L3 cache0 KB48 MB
Chip lithography130 nm5 nm
Die size193 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)63 °Cno data
Number of transistors105 million57000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 FX-55 and Apple M1 Max compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
Socket939no data
Power consumption (TDP)104 Wattno data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 FX-55 and Apple M1 Max. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1 Depends on motherboardno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 64 FX-55 404
Apple M1 Max 22063
+5361%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 October 2004 18 October 2021
Physical cores 1 10
Threads 1 10
Chip lithography 130 nm 5 nm

Apple M1 Max has an age advantage of 17 years, 900% more physical cores and 900% more threads, and a 2500% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 FX-55 and Apple M1 Max. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Athlon 64 FX-55 is a desktop processor while Apple M1 Max is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 FX-55 and Apple M1 Max, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 FX-55
Athlon 64 FX-55
Apple M1 Max
M1 Max

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate Athlon 64 FX-55 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 678 votes

Rate Apple M1 Max on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 FX-55 or Apple M1 Max, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.