Ryzen Embedded R1606G vs Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)

VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
2024
14 cores / 14 threads, 40 Watt
27.16
+945%
Ryzen Embedded R1606G
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
2.60

Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) outperforms Ryzen Embedded R1606G by a whopping 945% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Ryzen Embedded R1606G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1801725
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesApple M4AMD Ryzen Embedded
Power efficiency64.269.84
Architecture codenameno dataZen (2017−2020)
Release date30 October 2024 (less than a year ago)25 February 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Ryzen Embedded R1606G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads144
Base clock speedno data2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplierno data26
L1 cacheno data96K (per core)
L2 cacheno data512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography3 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data209.8 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistorsno data4,950 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Ryzen Embedded R1606G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
Socketno dataFP5
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Ryzen Embedded R1606G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Ryzen Embedded R1606G are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Ryzen Embedded R1606G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-2400
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Apple M4 20-core GPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1200 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Ryzen Embedded R1606G.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) 27.16
+945%
Ryzen Embedded R1606G 2.60

CrossMark Overall

Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) 2155
+244%
Ryzen Embedded R1606G 626

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 27.16 2.60
Recency 30 October 2024 25 February 2020
Physical cores 14 2
Threads 14 4
Chip lithography 3 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 25 Watt

Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) has a 944.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 600% more physical cores and 250% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

Ryzen Embedded R1606G, on the other hand, has 60% lower power consumption.

The Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen Embedded R1606G in performance tests.

Note that Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) is a desktop processor while Ryzen Embedded R1606G is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Ryzen Embedded R1606G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
M4 Pro (14 cores)
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1606G
Ryzen Embedded R1606G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 8 votes

Rate Ryzen Embedded R1606G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) or Ryzen Embedded R1606G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.