Ryzen 7 7840H vs Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
Aggregate performance score
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) outperforms Ryzen 7 7840H by an impressive 53% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing M4 Pro (14 cores) and Ryzen 7 7840H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 181 | 350 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | Apple M4 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 64.21 | 48.03 |
| Architecture codename | no data | Phoenix (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 30 October 2024 (less than a year ago) | January 2023 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
M4 Pro (14 cores) and Ryzen 7 7840H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 14 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | no data | 178 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 25,000 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | + |
Compatibility
Information on M4 Pro (14 cores) and Ryzen 7 7840H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M4 Pro (14 cores) and Ryzen 7 7840H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M4 Pro (14 cores) and Ryzen 7 7840H are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M4 Pro (14 cores) and Ryzen 7 7840H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5-5600 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Apple M4 20-core GPU | AMD Radeon 780M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M4 Pro (14 cores) and Ryzen 7 7840H.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 26.95 | 17.64 |
| Physical cores | 14 | 8 |
| Threads | 14 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 35 Watt |
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) has a 52.8% higher aggregate performance score, 75% more physical cores, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.
Ryzen 7 7840H, on the other hand, has 14.3% more threads, and 14.3% lower power consumption.
The M4 Pro (14 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 7840H in performance tests.
Note that Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) is a desktop processor while Ryzen 7 7840H is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Ryzen 7 7840H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
