Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U vs Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
Aggregate performance score
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U by a whopping 103% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 180 | 560 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | Apple M4 | AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) |
| Power efficiency | 64.26 | 84.54 |
| Architecture codename | no data | Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) |
| Release date | 30 October 2024 (less than a year ago) | 23 May 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 14 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 6 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | no data | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | + |
Compatibility
Information on Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 15 Watt |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Apple M4 20-core GPU | AMD Radeon 760M ( - 2600 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 27.16 | 13.40 |
| Recency | 30 October 2024 | 23 May 2023 |
| Physical cores | 14 | 6 |
| Threads | 14 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 40 Watt | 15 Watt |
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) has a 102.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 133.3% more physical cores and 16.7% more threads, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U, on the other hand, has 166.7% lower power consumption.
The Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U in performance tests.
Note that Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) is a desktop processor while Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
