Apple M4 Max (14 cores) vs Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U
Aggregate performance score
Apple M4 Max (14 cores) outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U by an impressive 81% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 647 | 258 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) | Apple M4 |
| Power efficiency | 34.13 | 11.55 |
| Designer | AMD | Apple |
| Architecture codename | Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) | no data |
| Release date | 23 May 2023 (2 years ago) | 30 November 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U and M4 Max (14 cores) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 14 |
| Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.9 GHz | 4.51 GHz |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 6 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| Die size | 178 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U and M4 Max (14 cores) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 80 Watt |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 760M ( - 2600 MHz) | Apple M4 32-core GPU |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 13.24 | 23.90 |
| Recency | 23 May 2023 | 30 November 2024 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 14 |
| Threads | 12 | 14 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 80 Watt |
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U has 433.3% lower power consumption.
Apple M4 Max (14 cores), on the other hand, has a 80.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 133.3% more physical cores and 16.7% more threads, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.
The Apple M4 Max (14 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640U in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
