Celeron 3765U vs Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)

VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
2024
14 cores / 14 threads, 40 Watt
27.16
+3338%
Celeron 3765U
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.79

Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) outperforms Celeron 3765U by a whopping 3338% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Celeron 3765U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1802623
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesApple M4Intel Celeron
Power efficiency64.264.98
Architecture codenameno dataBroadwell (2015−2019)
Release date30 October 2024 (less than a year ago)1 June 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Detailed specifications

Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Celeron 3765U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads142
Base clock speedno data1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz1.9 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cacheno data512 KB
L3 cacheno data2 MB
Chip lithography3 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data82 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistorsno data1300 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Celeron 3765U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataFCBGA1168
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Celeron 3765U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Smart Responseno data-
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Celeron 3765U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
OS Guardno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Celeron 3765U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Celeron 3765U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Apple M4 20-core GPUIntel HD Graphics for 5th Generation Intel Processors
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Graphics max frequencyno data850 MHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Celeron 3765U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Celeron 3765U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data11.2/12

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Celeron 3765U.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 27.16 0.79
Recency 30 October 2024 1 June 2015
Physical cores 14 2
Threads 14 2
Chip lithography 3 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 15 Watt

Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) has a 3338% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 600% more physical cores and 600% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron 3765U, on the other hand, has 166.7% lower power consumption.

The Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 3765U in performance tests.

Note that Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) is a desktop processor while Celeron 3765U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) and Celeron 3765U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
M4 Pro (14 cores)
Intel Celeron 3765U
Celeron 3765U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 3765U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) or Celeron 3765U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.