Ryzen Threadripper 1920 vs Apple M4 Max (16 cores)

VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
2024
16 cores / 16 threads, 90 Watt
27.97
+101%
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
2017
12 cores / 24 threads, 140 Watt
13.89

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1920 by a whopping 101% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen Threadripper 1920 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking168534
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesApple M4no data
Power efficiency29.419.39
Architecture codenameno dataZen (2017−2020)
Release date30 October 2024 (less than a year ago)29 July 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen Threadripper 1920 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads1624
Base clock speedno data3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.51 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cacheno data96K (per core)
L2 cacheno data512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data32 MB
Chip lithography3 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data213 mm2
Number of transistorsno data9,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen Threadripper 1920 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataSP3r2
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt140 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen Threadripper 1920. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen Threadripper 1920 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen Threadripper 1920. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4 Quad-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardApple M4 40-core GPUno data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 27.97 13.89
Recency 30 October 2024 29 July 2017
Physical cores 16 12
Threads 16 24
Chip lithography 3 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 140 Watt

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) has a 101.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 33.3% more physical cores, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 55.6% lower power consumption.

Ryzen Threadripper 1920, on the other hand, has 50% more threads.

The Apple M4 Max (16 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen Threadripper 1920 in performance tests.

Be aware that Apple M4 Max (16 cores) is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper 1920 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen Threadripper 1920, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
M4 Max (16 cores)
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920
Ryzen Threadripper 1920

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Apple M4 Max (16 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 22 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper 1920 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Apple M4 Max (16 cores) or Ryzen Threadripper 1920, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.