Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G vs Apple M4 Max (16 cores)

VS

Aggregate performance score

Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
2024
16 cores / 16 threads, 90 Watt
27.79
+560%
Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
2018
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.21

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) outperforms Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G by a whopping 560% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1671385
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesApple M4AMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency29.436.17
Architecture codenameno dataZen (2017−2020)
Release date30 October 2024 (less than a year ago)10 May 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads164
Boost clock speed4.51 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplierno data35
L1 cacheno data384 KB
L2 cacheno data2 MB
L3 cacheno data4 MB
Chip lithography3 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data209.78 mm2
Number of transistorsno data4950 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
Socketno dataSocket AM4
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-2933
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data46.933 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Apple M4 40-core GPUAMD Radeon Vega 8

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 27.79 4.21
Recency 30 October 2024 10 May 2018
Physical cores 16 4
Threads 16 4
Chip lithography 3 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 65 Watt

Apple M4 Max (16 cores) has a 560.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G, on the other hand, has 38.5% lower power consumption.

The M4 Max (16 cores) is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G in performance tests.

Be aware that Apple M4 Max (16 cores) is a notebook processor while Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Apple M4 Max (16 cores) and Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
M4 Max (16 cores)
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 16 votes

Rate M4 Max (16 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 91 vote

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about M4 Max (16 cores) or Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.