Pentium M 760 vs A9-9425

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing A9-9425 and Pentium M 760 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1930not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgePentium M
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Dothan (2004−2005)
Release date31 May 2016 (8 years ago)January 2005 (19 years ago)
Current price$561 $381

Detailed specifications

A9-9425 and Pentium M 760 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed3.1 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz2 GHz
Bus supportno data533 MHz
L1 cache128K (per core)32 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography28 nm90 nm
Die size124.5 mm284 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million140 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage rangeno data1.26V-1.356V

Compatibility

Information on A9-9425 and Pentium M 760 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFT4H-PBGA479,PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt27 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A9-9425 and Pentium M 760. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDDR4-2133 RAM (1 channel), PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRANDno data
AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

A9-9425 and Pentium M 760 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A9-9425 and Pentium M 760 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A9-9425 and Pentium M 760. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A9-9425 2314
+179%
Pentium M 760 830

A9-9425 outperforms Pentium M 760 by 179% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

A9-9425 25.83
+233%
Pentium M 760 86

Pentium M 760 outperforms A9-9425 by 233% in wPrime 32.

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 27 Watt

We couldn't decide between A9-9425 and Pentium M 760. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between A9-9425 and Pentium M 760, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A9-9425
A9-9425
Intel Pentium M 760
Pentium M 760

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1508 votes

Rate A9-9425 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 11 votes

Rate Pentium M 760 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A9-9425 or Pentium M 760, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.