Athlon 300U vs A9-9420e

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

A9-9420e
2018
2 cores / 2 threads
0.71

Athlon 300U outperforms A9-9420e by 258% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A9-9420e and Athlon 300U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking25741634
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeAMD Athlon
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Raven Ridge 2 (2019)
Release date1 June 2018 (5 years ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Current price$380 $486

Detailed specifications

A9-9420e and Athlon 300U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speedno data3.3 GHz
L1 cacheno data128K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Die size124.5 mm2209.78 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors1200 Million4500 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A9-9420e and Athlon 300U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketBGAFP5
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A9-9420e and Athlon 300U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSingle-Channel DDR4-2133?, Virtualization,XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A9-9420e and Athlon 300U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A9-9420e and Athlon 300U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)AMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A9-9420e and Athlon 300U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A9-9420e 0.71
Athlon 300U 2.54
+258%

Athlon 300U outperforms A9-9420e by 258% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A9-9420e 1099
Athlon 300U 3923
+257%

Athlon 300U outperforms A9-9420e by 257% in Passmark.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A9-9420e 97
Athlon 300U 308
+218%

Athlon 300U outperforms A9-9420e by 218% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.71 2.54
Integrated graphics card 1.33 2.97
Recency 1 June 2018 6 January 2019
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

The Athlon 300U is our recommended choice as it beats the A9-9420e in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A9-9420e and Athlon 300U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A9-9420e
A9-9420e
AMD Athlon 300U
Athlon 300U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 134 votes

Rate A9-9420e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 440 votes

Rate Athlon 300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A9-9420e or Athlon 300U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.