Athlon 300U vs A9-9420

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A9-9420
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.97

Athlon 300U outperforms A9-9420 by a whopping 162% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A9-9420 and Athlon 300U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking23871650
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeAMD Athlon
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Current price$440 $486

Detailed specifications

A9-9420 and Athlon 300U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed3 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.3 GHz
L1 cache128K (per core)192 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cacheno data4 MB
Chip lithography28 nm12 nm
Die size124.5 mm2209.78 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1200 Million4500 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A9-9420 and Athlon 300U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketBGAAM4
Power consumption (TDP)10-25 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A9-9420 and Athlon 300U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSingle-Channel DDR4-2133, Virtualization,XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A9-9420 and Athlon 300U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A9-9420 and Athlon 300U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardRadeon R5AMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A9-9420 and Athlon 300U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A9-9420 0.97
Athlon 300U 2.54
+162%

Athlon 300U outperforms A9-9420 by 162% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A9-9420 1497
Athlon 300U 3923
+162%

Athlon 300U outperforms A9-9420 by 162% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

A9-9420 2875
Athlon 300U 3968
+38%

Athlon 300U outperforms A9-9420 by 38% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A9-9420 4841
Athlon 300U 8724
+80.2%

Athlon 300U outperforms A9-9420 by 80% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

A9-9420 21.29
Athlon 300U 15.44
+37.9%

A9-9420 outperforms Athlon 300U by 38% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A9-9420 134
Athlon 300U 308
+130%

Athlon 300U outperforms A9-9420 by 130% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

A9-9420 81
Athlon 300U 119
+46.9%

Athlon 300U outperforms A9-9420 by 47% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

A9-9420 1.1
Athlon 300U 1.9
+72.7%

Athlon 300U outperforms A9-9420 by 73% in TrueCrypt AES.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.97 2.54
Recency 1 June 2016 6 January 2019
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 15 Watt

The Athlon 300U is our recommended choice as it beats the A9-9420 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A9-9420 and Athlon 300U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A9-9420
A9-9420
AMD Athlon 300U
Athlon 300U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 498 votes

Rate A9-9420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 442 votes

Rate Athlon 300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A9-9420 or Athlon 300U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.