AMD A9-9410 vs A6-9225
Comparing A9-9410 and A6-9225 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture and sales start time and price.
A9-9410 and A6-9225 quantitative parameters such as cores and threads number, clocks, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of A9-9410 and A6-9225 performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Number of cores
Number of threads
Manufacturing process technology
Maximum core temperature
64 bit support
Information on A9-9410 and A6-9225 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.
Power consumption (TDP)
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A9-9410 and A6-9225. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A9-9410 and A6-9225 are enumerated here.
Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by A9-9410 and A6-9225.
Supported memory types
Max memory channels
General parameters of GPUs integrated into A9-9410 and A6-9225.
AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 655 MHz)
iGPU core count
Available interfaces and connections of A9-9410 and A6-9225 integrated GPUs.
Graphics API support
APIs supported by A9-9410 and A6-9225 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A9-9410 and A6-9225.
Max number of PCIe lanes
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of A9-9410 and A6-9225. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
A9-9410 1.75 +2.3%
A9-9410 2455 +15.2%
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
A9-9410 2694 +6.4%
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
A9-9410 4619 +10.2%
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
A6-9225 1 +3.7%
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
A9-9410 2 +33.3%
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
A6-9225 73 +15.9%
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
A9-9410 130 +19.3%
A9-9410 24 +9.7%
A9-9410 879 +3.2%
x264 encoding pass 1
A9-9410 54 +10.2%
x264 encoding pass 2
A9-9410 10 +11.1%
A6-9225 1 +0%
A9-9410 4260 +8.2%
Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core
A9-9410 2134 +15%
Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core
A9-9410 3299 +6.3%
Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core
A9-9410 2133 +11.1%
Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core
A9-9410 3182 +4.8%
A9-9410 1425 +2.7%
Let's see how good A9-9410 and A6-9225 are for gaming compared with game system requirements. Remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect real performance inaccurately.
Advantages of AMD A9-9410
2.3% faster in synthetic tests
Enduro (saves battery charge by automatically switching between an integrated and discrete AMD GPU depending on workload. Similar to NVIDIA Optimus)
Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)
Advantages of AMD A6-9225
Much newer (1 June 2018 vs 1 June 2016)
So, A9-9410 or A6-9225?
Technical City couldn't decide between AMD A9-9410 and AMD A6-9225. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between A9-9410 and A6-9225, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.