3020e vs A9-9400 SoC
Primary details
Comparing A9-9400 SoC and 3020e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 2016 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU) |
| Architecture codename | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) | Dali (Zen) |
| Release date | 31 May 2016 (8 years ago) | 4 August 2020 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
A9-9400 SoC and 3020e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 160 KB | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 125 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,200 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on A9-9400 SoC and 3020e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FT4 | FT5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A9-9400 SoC and 3020e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | DDR4-2400, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A9-9400 SoC and 3020e are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A9-9400 SoC and 3020e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Radeon R5 3CU | AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A9-9400 SoC and 3020e.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 8 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 31 May 2016 | 4 August 2020 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 6 Watt |
We couldn't decide between A9-9400 SoC and 3020e. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that A9-9400 SoC is a desktop processor while 3020e is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between A9-9400 SoC and 3020e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
