3020e vs A9-9400 SoC

VS

Primary details

Comparing A9-9400 SoC and 3020e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2137
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
Power efficiencyno data24.13
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Dali (Zen) (2020)
Release date31 May 2016 (8 years ago)4 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A9-9400 SoC and 3020e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.4 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz2.6 GHz
L1 cache160 KB192 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB
Chip lithography28 nm14 nm
Die size125 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on A9-9400 SoC and 3020e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFT4FT5
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A9-9400 SoC and 3020e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A9-9400 SoC and 3020e are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A9-9400 SoC and 3020e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardRadeon R5 3CUAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A9-9400 SoC and 3020e.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 May 2016 4 August 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 6 Watt

3020e has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A9-9400 SoC and 3020e. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that A9-9400 SoC is a desktop processor while 3020e is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A9-9400 SoC and 3020e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A9-9400 SoC
A9-9400 SoC
AMD 3020e
3020e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 77 votes

Rate A9-9400 SoC on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 815 votes

Rate 3020e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A9-9400 SoC or 3020e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.