A6-9220C vs A8-7410

VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-7410
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 12 Watt
1.73
+162%
A6-9220C
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
0.66

A8-7410 outperforms A6-9220C by a whopping 162% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A8-7410 and A6-9220C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20332739
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency6.5510.41
Architecture codenameCarrizo-L (2015)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date7 May 2015 (9 years ago)7 January 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A8-7410 and A6-9220C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.2 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz2.7 GHz
Multiplierno data18
L1 cacheno data160 KB
L2 cache2048 KB1 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors930 Million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A8-7410 and A6-9220C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP4FT4
Power consumption (TDP)12 - 25 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-7410 and A6-9220C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, BMI1, F16C, AMD64, VT, AMD-VVirtualization,
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-7410 and A6-9220C are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-7410 and A6-9220C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1866DDR4
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data14.936 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R5 GraphicsAMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-7410 and A6-9220C integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8-7410 and A6-9220C integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-7410 and A6-9220C.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-7410 1.73
+162%
A6-9220C 0.66

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A8-7410 2741
+160%
A6-9220C 1053

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.73 0.66
Recency 7 May 2015 7 January 2019
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 6 Watt

A8-7410 has a 162.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

A6-9220C, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and 100% lower power consumption.

The A8-7410 is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-9220C in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-7410 and A6-9220C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-7410
A8-7410
AMD A6-9220C
A6-9220C

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 696 votes

Rate A8-7410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 32 votes

Rate A6-9220C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-7410 or A6-9220C, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.