Celeron 4305UE vs Pentium N4200
Aggregate performance score
Pentium N4200 outperforms Celeron 4305UE by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Pentium N4200 and Celeron 4305UE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2229 | 2410 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Pentium | no data |
Power efficiency | 21.52 | 6.75 |
Architecture codename | Apollo Lake (2014−2016) | Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) |
Release date | 1 September 2016 (8 years ago) | 1 October 2018 (6 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $161 | $107 |
Detailed specifications
Pentium N4200 and Celeron 4305UE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 1.1 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 2 GHz |
L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 256 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 2 MB L2 Cache | 2 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium N4200 and Celeron 4305UE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FCBGA1296 | Intel BGA 1528 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium N4200 and Celeron 4305UE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Smart Response | - | no data |
GPIO | + | no data |
Smart Connect | - | no data |
HD Audio | + | no data |
RST | - | no data |
Security technologies
Pentium N4200 and Celeron 4305UE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Secure Boot | + | no data |
Secure Key | + | no data |
MPX | + | - |
Identity Protection | + | - |
OS Guard | + | no data |
Anti-Theft | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium N4200 and Celeron 4305UE are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | + |
VT-x | + | + |
VT-i | - | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium N4200 and Celeron 4305UE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3, DDR3, DDR4 | DDR4 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics 505 | Intel UHD Graphics 610 |
Max video memory | 8 GB | no data |
Quick Sync Video | + | - |
Clear Video | + | no data |
Clear Video HD | + | no data |
Graphics max frequency | 750 MHz | no data |
Execution Units | 18 | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Pentium N4200 and Celeron 4305UE integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
eDP | + | no data |
DisplayPort | + | - |
HDMI | + | - |
MIPI-DSI | + | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Pentium N4200 and Celeron 4305UE integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | + | no data |
OpenGL | + | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium N4200 and Celeron 4305UE.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 6 | 16 |
USB revision | 2.0/3.0 | no data |
Total number of SATA ports | 2 | no data |
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | 2 | no data |
Number of USB ports | 8 | no data |
Integrated LAN | - | no data |
UART | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 1.39 | 1.09 |
Integrated graphics card | 0.94 | 1.89 |
Recency | 1 September 2016 | 1 October 2018 |
Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
Threads | 4 | 2 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 15 Watt |
Pentium N4200 has a 27.5% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 150% lower power consumption.
Celeron 4305UE, on the other hand, has 101.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.
The Pentium N4200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron 4305UE in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium N4200 and Celeron 4305UE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.