E-350 vs A8-3510MX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing A8-3510MX and E-350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2341not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD E-Series
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Zacate (2011−2013)
Release date14 June 2011 (13 years ago)4 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Current price$77 $268

Detailed specifications

A8-3510MX and E-350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz1.6 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm40 nm
Die size228 mm275 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A8-3510MX and E-350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFS1FT1
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-3510MX and E-350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6620G, DDR3(L)-1333/1600 Memory ControllerDDR3-1066/DDR3L-1066 RAM, PCIe 2 [?], MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-3510MX and E-350 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-3510MX and E-350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 6620GAMD Radeon HD 6310

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A8-3510MX 1614
+283%
E-350 421

A8-3510MX outperforms E-350 by 283% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A8-3510MX 299
+188%
E-350 104

A8-3510MX outperforms E-350 by 188% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A8-3510MX 939
+419%
E-350 181

A8-3510MX outperforms E-350 by 419% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A8-3510MX 6158
+207%
E-350 2005

A8-3510MX outperforms E-350 by 207% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 June 2011 4 January 2011
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 18 Watt

We couldn't decide between A8-3510MX and E-350. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-3510MX and E-350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-3510MX
A8-3510MX
AMD E-350
E-350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 40 votes

Rate A8-3510MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 374 votes

Rate E-350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-3510MX or E-350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.