M-5Y10 vs A8-3510MX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A8-3510MX
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 45 Watt
1.03
Core M-5Y10
2014
2 cores / 4 threads, 4 Watt
1.03

Primary details

Comparing A8-3510MX and Core M-5Y10 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking24572452
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesIntel Core M
Power efficiency2.1719.51
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Broadwell-Y (2014)
Release date14 June 2011 (13 years ago)5 September 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

A8-3510MX and Core M-5Y10 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.8 GHz0.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz2 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Multiplierno data8
L1 cache128 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size228 mm250 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistors1,178 million1300 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A8-3510MX and Core M-5Y10 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFS1FCBGA1234
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt4.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A8-3510MX and Core M-5Y10. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6620GIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Smart Responseno data+
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

A8-3510MX and Core M-5Y10 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A8-3510MX and Core M-5Y10 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A8-3510MX and Core M-5Y10. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 6620G (444 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 5300
Max video memoryno data16 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data800 MHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A8-3510MX and Core M-5Y10 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by A8-3510MX and Core M-5Y10 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data2560x1600@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data2560x1600@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A8-3510MX and Core M-5Y10 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data11.2/12
OpenGLno data4.3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A8-3510MX and Core M-5Y10.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A8-3510MX 1.03
M-5Y10 1.03

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A8-3510MX 1631
M-5Y10 1644
+0.8%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A8-3510MX 233
M-5Y10 462
+98.3%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A8-3510MX 631
M-5Y10 958
+51.8%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

A8-3510MX 6158
+18%
M-5Y10 5217

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Integrated graphics card 0.89 1.04
Recency 14 June 2011 5 September 2014
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 4 Watt

A8-3510MX has 100% more physical cores.

M-5Y10, on the other hand, has 16.9% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 1025% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between A8-3510MX and Core M-5Y10.


Should you still have questions on choice between A8-3510MX and Core M-5Y10, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A8-3510MX
A8-3510MX
Intel Core M-5Y10
Core M-5Y10

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 42 votes

Rate A8-3510MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 9 votes

Rate Core M-5Y10 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A8-3510MX or Core M-5Y10, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.