Ryzen 3 PRO 210 vs A6-9210

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-9210
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.71
Ryzen 3 PRO 210
2025
4 cores / 8 threads, 4 Watt
6.89
+870%

Ryzen 3 PRO 210 outperforms A6-9210 by a whopping 870% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29101182
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)
Power efficiency5.08no data
DesignerAMDAMD
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025)
Release date1 June 2016 (9 years ago)6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

A6-9210 and Ryzen 3 PRO 210 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz4.7 GHz
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cache1024 KB4 MB
L3 cacheno data8 MB
Chip lithography28 nm4 nm
Die size124.5 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1200 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on A6-9210 and Ryzen 3 PRO 210 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP4FP7/FP7r2
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt4 MB + 8 MB

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-9210 and Ryzen 3 PRO 210. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsVirtualization,AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-9210 and Ryzen 3 PRO 210 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-9210 and Ryzen 3 PRO 210. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2133DDR5
Max memory channels1no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R4 GraphicsAMD Radeon 740M ( - 2500 MHz)
iGPU core count3no data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-9210 and Ryzen 3 PRO 210 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-9210 and Ryzen 3 PRO 210 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-9210 and Ryzen 3 PRO 210.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

A6-9210 0.71
Ryzen 3 PRO 210 6.89
+870%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

A6-9210 1254
Samples: 49
Ryzen 3 PRO 210 12155
+869%
Samples: 10

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.71 6.89
Recency 1 June 2016 6 January 2025
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 4 Watt

Ryzen 3 PRO 210 has a 870.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 600% more advanced lithography process, and 275% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 210 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A6-9210 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-9210
A6-9210
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 210
Ryzen 3 PRO 210

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 154 votes

Rate A6-9210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors A6-9210 and Ryzen 3 PRO 210, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.