Ryzen 3 PRO 210 vs A4-9125 SoC
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | no data |
| Architecture codename | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) |
| Release date | April 2017 (8 years ago) | 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
A4-9125 SoC and Ryzen 3 PRO 210 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 2.3 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 160 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (shared) | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 8 MB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 125 mm2 | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1,200 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on A4-9125 SoC and Ryzen 3 PRO 210 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | FT4 | FP7/FP7r2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-9125 SoC and Ryzen 3 PRO 210. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-9125 SoC and Ryzen 3 PRO 210 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-9125 SoC and Ryzen 3 PRO 210. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Radeon R3 2CU | AMD Radeon 740M ( - 2500 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-9125 SoC and Ryzen 3 PRO 210.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 8 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 28 Watt |
A4-9125 SoC has 86.7% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 3 PRO 210, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between AMD A4-9125 SoC and AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 210. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
