Ryzen 3 PRO 210 vs A4-9120
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2744 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Bristol Ridge | AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c) |
| Power efficiency | 4.85 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Stoney Ridge (2016−2019) | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025) |
| Release date | 1 June 2017 (7 years ago) | 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
A4-9120 and Ryzen 3 PRO 210 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 160 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 8 MB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 124.5 mm2 | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1200 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on A4-9120 and Ryzen 3 PRO 210 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | BGA | FP7/FP7r2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 28 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-9120 and Ryzen 3 PRO 210. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Virtualization, | AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3 |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-9120 and Ryzen 3 PRO 210 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-9120 and Ryzen 3 PRO 210. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 655 MHz) | AMD Radeon 740M ( - 2500 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 0.94 | 7.61 |
| Recency | 1 June 2017 | 6 January 2025 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 28 Watt |
A4-9120 has 86.7% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 3 PRO 210, on the other hand, has 709.6% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between AMD A4-9120 and AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 210. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
