Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 vs A6-5350M

VS

Aggregate performance score

A6-5350M
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.77
+381%
Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7
1 core / 1 thread, 30 Watt
0.16

A6-5350M outperforms Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 by a whopping 381% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A6-5350M and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26513295
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesPentium 4-M
Power efficiency2.080.50
Architecture codenameRichland (2013−2014)Northwood (2002−2004)
Release date1 June 2013 (11 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

A6-5350M and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed2.9 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz1.7 GHz
Bus rateno data400 MHz
L2 cache2048 KBno data
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nm130 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,178 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on A6-5350M and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFS1r2no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A6-5350M and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMAno data
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A6-5350M and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A6-5350M and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600no data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon HD 8450Gno data
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A6-5350M and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A6-5350M and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 11no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A6-5350M and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7.

PCIe versionNot Listedno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A6-5350M 0.77
+381%
Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 0.16

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

A6-5350M 1649
+166%
Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 620

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

A6-5350M 40.86
+505%
Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 247

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.77 0.16
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 30 Watt

A6-5350M has a 381.3% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 306.3% more advanced lithography process.

Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7, on the other hand, has 16.7% lower power consumption.

The A6-5350M is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A6-5350M and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A6-5350M
A6-5350M
Intel Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7
Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 27 votes

Rate A6-5350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 12 votes

Rate Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A6-5350M or Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.