EPYC 72F3 vs A4-6210

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-6210
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
0.94
EPYC 72F3
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 180 Watt
17.16
+1726%

EPYC 72F3 outperforms A4-6210 by a whopping 1726% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-6210 and EPYC 72F3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2524374
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.59
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD EPYC
Power efficiency5.939.02
Architecture codenameBeema (2014)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date29 April 2014 (10 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,468

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

A4-6210 and EPYC 72F3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speedno data3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz4.1 GHz
Multiplierno data37
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm7 nm+
Die sizeno data8x 81 mm2
Number of transistorsno data33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on A4-6210 and EPYC 72F3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketFT3bSP3
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-6210 and EPYC 72F3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVXno data
AES-NI++
FMAFMA4-
AVX++
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
VirusProtect+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-6210 and EPYC 72F3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-6210 and EPYC 72F3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1599DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TiB
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.795 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R3 GraphicsN/A
Enduro+-
Switchable graphics+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A4-6210 and EPYC 72F3 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A4-6210 and EPYC 72F3 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-6210 and EPYC 72F3.

PCIe version2.04.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-6210 0.94
EPYC 72F3 17.16
+1726%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A4-6210 1495
EPYC 72F3 27252
+1723%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.94 17.16
Recency 29 April 2014 15 March 2021
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 180 Watt

A4-6210 has 1100% lower power consumption.

EPYC 72F3, on the other hand, has a 1725.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 72F3 is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-6210 in performance tests.

Be aware that A4-6210 is a notebook processor while EPYC 72F3 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-6210 and EPYC 72F3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-6210
A4-6210
AMD EPYC 72F3
EPYC 72F3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 155 votes

Rate A4-6210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 6 votes

Rate EPYC 72F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-6210 or EPYC 72F3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.