Ryzen 5 3550H vs A4-3300M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

A4-3300M
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.77
Ryzen 5 3550H
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 35 Watt
5.03
+553%

Ryzen 5 3550H outperforms A4-3300M by a whopping 553% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing A4-3300M and Ryzen 5 3550H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking25431149
Place by popularitynot in top-10082
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD A-SeriesAMD Ryzen 5
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Picasso-U (Zen+)
Release date14 June 2011 (13 years ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Current price$61 $734

Detailed specifications

A4-3300M and Ryzen 5 3550H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed1.9 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm12 nm
Die size228 mm2209.78 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors1,178 million4500 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A4-3300M and Ryzen 5 3550H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFS1FP5
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A4-3300M and Ryzen 5 3550H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, DDR3 Memory Controller, Radeon HD 6480GDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A4-3300M and Ryzen 5 3550H are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A4-3300M and Ryzen 5 3550H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.4 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 6480GAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A4-3300M and Ryzen 5 3550H.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A4-3300M 0.77
Ryzen 5 3550H 5.03
+553%

Ryzen 5 3550H outperforms A4-3300M by 553% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

A4-3300M 1186
Ryzen 5 3550H 7785
+556%

Ryzen 5 3550H outperforms A4-3300M by 556% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A4-3300M 227
Ryzen 5 3550H 943
+315%

Ryzen 5 3550H outperforms A4-3300M by 315% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

A4-3300M 399
Ryzen 5 3550H 2857
+616%

Ryzen 5 3550H outperforms A4-3300M by 616% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

A4-3300M 1742
Ryzen 5 3550H 4592
+164%

Ryzen 5 3550H outperforms A4-3300M by 164% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A4-3300M 3417
Ryzen 5 3550H 19521
+471%

Ryzen 5 3550H outperforms A4-3300M by 471% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A4-3300M 1556
Ryzen 5 3550H 7174
+361%

Ryzen 5 3550H outperforms A4-3300M by 361% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

A4-3300M 40.2
Ryzen 5 3550H 7.67
+424%

A4-3300M outperforms Ryzen 5 3550H by 424% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

A4-3300M 1
Ryzen 5 3550H 9
+663%

Ryzen 5 3550H outperforms A4-3300M by 663% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.77 5.03
Integrated graphics card 0.66 4.50
Recency 14 June 2011 6 January 2019
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 12 nm

The Ryzen 5 3550H is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-3300M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between A4-3300M and Ryzen 5 3550H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A4-3300M
A4-3300M
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
Ryzen 5 3550H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 98 votes

Rate A4-3300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 2673 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3550H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A4-3300M or Ryzen 5 3550H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.